Antepartum, Intrapartum, Postpartum Predictors and Outcomes of Discharge Readiness

Friday, April 24, 2015: 2:00 PM
Gabriella Malagon-Maldonado, DNP, CNS, NEA-BC , Nursing Research, Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns, San Diego, CA
Cynthia D. Connelly, PhD, RN, FAAN , University of San Diego Hahn School of Nursing and Health Science, San Diego, CA
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum predictors of readiness for hospital discharge and post-discharge outcomes.

Background/Conceptual Framework: Pregnancy and childbirth are significant events in the lives of women and their families where the discharge decision-making process involves careful judgment in projecting the mom’s ability to cope with family care needs after discharge. Research examining the impact of discharge teaching to improve discharge readiness and maternal outcomes, taking into consideration transition factors that may influence a mother’s ability to apply discharge information, has not been previously conducted. The Adaptation to Transitions conceptual framework composed of conceptually-related variables was used to study factors associated with transition processes that influence discharge readiness in the antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum periods and the results of care.

Methods:  Descriptive correlational repeated measure design. A purposive sample of English and Spanish-speaking postpartum mothers who experienced a vaginal or cesarean birth of a healthy infant (N = 185) completed demographic, quality of discharge teaching, and readiness for hospital discharge questionnaires prior to discharge. Items were related to the nature of transition and transition conditions effecting patterns of response during labor and postpartum. Discharge teaching was the nursing therapeutic process under investigation during hospital transitions to home. Four weeks post-discharge,  participants completed a coping difficulty questionnaire consistent with postpartum patterns of responses and modes of adaptation, and the quality of discharge teaching questionnaire, to compare pre- and post- hospital discharge perceptions of teaching.

Results:  A final model was computed with all significant predictors for readiness for hospital discharge and post-discharge coping difficulty. Delivery of education was the only significant independent predictor, accounting for 33% of the variance in readiness for hospital discharge (R2 =0.33, R2adj =0.32, F (8,185) =88.08, p=0.01). Readiness of hospital discharge was the only significant independent predictor accounting for 27% of the variance in post-discharge coping difficulty (R2 =0.27, R2adj =0.26, F (5, 67) =62.89, p=0.01). A statistically significant difference in the quality of discharge teaching between pre- and post- hospital discharge was noted (t (66) = 2.60, p=0.01) where the quality of discharge teaching mean score decreased from pre-hospital discharge to post-hospital discharge (mean change = -0.485, 95% CI=0.857-0.113).

Implications:  The relationship between quality of discharge teaching and the antepartum, intrapartum, postpartum factors, readiness for discharge, and post-discharge coping, provides evidence of nurses’ critical role in educating patients in caring for themselves and their baby. Patient perception of discharge readiness may be both a process measure, to identify patients in need of additional interventions before and after discharge, and a nurse-sensitive outcome measure of the postpartum hospitalization experience. Building systems of care that routinely assess quality of discharge teaching and discharge readiness will promote optimal outcomes of the post-childbirth experience.