Use of Simulation in Student Nurse Stress Management: Pilot of the NURSE Intervention

Thursday, April 23, 2015: 11:00 AM
Colleen Delaney, PhD, RN, AHN-BC , Nursing, University of Connecticutt, Storrs, CT
Cynthia Barrere, PhD, RN, CNS, AHN-BC , Nursing, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT
Sue Robertson, RN, PhD, CNE , Nursing, California State University Fullerton, Fullerton, CA
Rothlyn Zahourek, PMHCNS, AHN-BC , Retired, Amherst, MA
Desiree Diaz, PhD, RN-BC, CNE , Nursing, University of Connecticutt, Storrs, CT
Heather Evans, PhD, RNC-MNN, CLC, RN , Nursing, University of Connecticutt, Storrs, CT
Leeanne Lachapelle, RN, MS , Nursing, University of Connecticutt, Storrs, CT
Aim:

The aim of this experimental pilot study was to evaluate a simulation-based educational program, termed NURSE (Nurture nurse, Use resources, Resilience, Stress and Environment management) that assists nursing students to develop stress management plans.

Background:

Student nurses experience significant stress during their education which may contribute to illness and alterations in health, poor academic performance, and program attrition. Given the global shortage of nurses and high dropout rates among students, the importance for developing stress management programs for student nurses is becoming paramount.

Methods:

A mixed-methods, randomized pilot design with 3 data collection points (baseline, immediately post-treatment, and 4 months post treatment) was used for the study. Forty junior nursing were randomly assigned to NURSE intervention (n= 20) or Attention Control Condition (n= 20). Intervention group participants received the 2-sessions of the 4-hour NURSE intervention. Attention control group participants received a case study simulation on therapeutic communication and general stress information. Outcome measures evaluated were: Stress using the Perceived Stress Scale, Resilience using the Brief Resilience Scale, Program Attrition Rates and Grade Point Averages(GPA). Qualitative data were collected at 4 months following the intervention, and used Colaizzi’s method of analysis to explore and describe nursing students’ experiences with, and application of, the NURSE intervention.

Results:

Thirty-seven students completed the study (18 in the intervention group and 19 in the control group). Ages ranged from 18-46 with a mean of 21.6. There were no significant differences found in stress, resilience, GPA, or attrition rates between intervention and control group participants. A subgroup of 7 intervention students participated in a follow-up interview to describe their experiences in the NURSE program. Interview data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s (1978) phenomenological method.  Five themes emerged from the data: (1) Stressed and Out of Balance, (2) Remembering to Hit the Pause Button, (3) Individualizing Techniques and Strategies, (4) The Power of Group Sharing, and (5) Integrating New Ways of Doing and Being.

Conclusions & Implications:

Results from this study provide evidence that the NURSE intervention is highly feasible and support further testing to examine the effect of the intervention in improving stress management in nursing students.