Gender Differences in Retirement Preparation Among Registered Nurses
This study utilized a cross sectional design with a convenience sample of 706 employed RNs. Hershey, Jacobs-Lawson, McArdle, and Hamagami’s Retirement Planning Preparation Questionnaire was used to assess retirement preparation through online survey methods. Hershey’s Conceptual Model of the Factors that Influence Investor Behavior served as the theoretical framework for this study.
Using analysis of variance statistical methods, the resulting sample demonstrated no statistical difference for gender in both future time perspective [F (1, 688) = .328, p = .567, partial eta = .000] and retirement goal clarity [F (1, 685) = .001, p = .971, partial eta = .000]. However, there was a statistical significance for gender in both self-rated knowledge of financial planning for retirement [F (1, 690) = 6.418, p = .012, partial eta = .009] [mean males = 4.76; females = 4.30], and retirement planning activity level [F (1, 662) = 9.53, p = .002, partial eta = .014] [mean males = 3.88; females = 3.34], indicating male RNs are more active than their female RN counterparts in these certain domains of retirement planning. Administration and nursing leadership should be aware that further assistance is needed for both male and female RNs in clarifying retirement goals. Female RNs may require more education and direction in financial planning than their male counterparts. Future studies should investigate the impact of financial education on retirement planning for both male and female RNs.